Rud Browne presented the following questions unannounced to the public at the January 4th meeting which was scheduled to Replace Senator Doug Ericksen.
Some political people are calling these “Summer campaign got ya questions” And are set up to cause further delay in the process of needed representation. Much of what he says is not in the purvey of the Council.
Questions for LD42 State Senate Candidates: As the outcome of the last Senate race in 2018 was decided by only 46 votes it is fair to say the 42nd District is evenly split between Democrats and Republicans. Whomever serves in the Senate seat will be expected by the voters to have a good understanding of the issues raised across the political spectrum.
1)What will you do to be effective in Olympia?
2)Why are you the best candidate to represent the 42nd Legislative District and what distinguishes you from the other nominees?
3)If appointed, what will be your top priorities and why?
4)How would you help maintain viable agriculture in the 42nd District?
5)The State House currently only allows vaccinated members to be in the House Chamber. If the Senate decides to impose the same vaccination requirements in order to be present in the Senate Chamber, are you be willing and able to comply with this requirement?
6)Share with us your thoughts on the Growth Management Act, and what, if any changes you would advocate for immediately?
7)Housing affordability is a key issue for all communities. Share with us your housing affordability priorities.
8)Our communities are also experiencing increasing levels of homelessness. What will you do as a legislator to meet the needs of Washingtonians who have no housing?
9)WA has an affordable housing crisis, what specific legislation would you propose to address this problem?
10) One way the California and Oregon legislatures have addressed the affordable housing shortage is by legalizing multi-family housing in all zoning areas, including single-family zoning, would you support this? Why or why not?
11) Transportation is a key issue for all WA communities. Share with us your transportation priorities.
12) WA State has significant transportation infrastructure needs, historically these investments have been funded by gas taxes.
• Do you believe we need to find more funding for transportation?
• Would you support raising the gas tax to fund additional investments in transportation?
• If you do not support raising the gas tax to pay for increased investments in transportation, where else would you get the revenue to pay for it?
13) In the last 2 years the residents of the 42nd have suffered more from the impacts of climate change than most other districts in the State. Two devastating floods, (the latest being the worst on record), drought, declining snowpack, and now severe freezing weather.
• Do you believe climate change is occurring?
• Do you believe the recent severe weather events experienced by the residents of the 42 nd district is due to climate change?
• Do you believe the cause of climate change is due to an increase of CO2 being released into the atmosphere from human consumption of fossil fuels?
• What policies will you advocate for in the legislature that will reduce and/or mitigate the impacts of the recent severe weather events experienced by the residents of the 42nd district
14) Every year the state legislature is considering more and more climate change related legislation. One such Bill currently making its way through the House is Engrossed 2nd Substitute – E2SHB 1099. • If this Bill reaches the Senate and you were asked to vote on it as currently written, would you vote in favor or in opposition?
• If you would not vote for it in its current form, but could edit it, what specific changes would you like to see made to the text of the bill, which if made, would allow you to vote for it?
15) If the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, will you support or oppose state laws and funding to allow all women in Washington to still have the freedom to retain control over their reproductive choices?
16) Gun violence and the proliferation of firearms used in crimes presents an ongoing danger to law-abiding residents of WA state and the Law Enforcement Officers tasked with protecting us. House Bill 1705 has been drafted to regulate a new threat called “Ghost Guns”
• If this Bill reaches the Senate and you were asked to vote on it as currently written, would you vote in favor or in opposition?
17) WA State has a very robust, inclusive, and accessible approach to voting, what if any aspect of the WA election system do you think needs to be changed and why?
18) If appointed to the position, do you intend to run for election to the 42 nd Senate seat in 2022?
19) [ Applicant Elenbaas only ] – If appointed, is it your intention to retain your position on the Whatcom County Council in addition to the Senate position, or will you resign from your position on the County Council effective immediately upon assuming the Senate position?
• If you intend to retain your seat on the County Council, how will you manage competing obligations that require your presence at the same time in both Whatcom County and Olympia?
20) What else would you like the residents of 42 nd district to know about you before the County Council votes on the appointment?
It appears you are the one making this into a false narrative. From another article: “The list of questions the applicants are being asked to answer was unanimously approved 6-0 by the full Council – Browne, Byrd, Buchannan, Kershner, Frazey and Donovan (Elenbaas recused himself).”
Thanks for listing to twenty questions. The OBVIOUS solution is for the three candidates to COLLABORATE their answers. Not saying exact copies, but they ought to be equal in every other way. Then the council doesn’t get to have their influence. They can pick their man by whoever has the nicest legs, or whatever criteria liberals generally will use.
The “20 questions” from Rud Browne are an embarrassment. An unabashed attempt at political grandstanding in the wrong forum. Their support by Executive Sidhu is further evidence that Sidhu and this Council, with the exception of Byrd and Kershner, needs to be replaced as soon as electoral circumstances permit.
This sorry, hyper partisan incident will come back to haunt Browne and his acolytes. I am amazed that our “Progressive” Council could be so far out of touch with the voters of Whatcom County.
Just for fun, how would Browne answer these questions ? Let’s bring his posturing to a more transparent level…
Suggest one additional question: “Councilmember Browne, did you consult with any person or group, eg; the Riveters Collective, in the preparation of these “20 Questions” ?
Be honest. Your reputation and political future is riding on your answer….
Shameful politics. This is unacceptable.
Here is a copy of email Rud Browne has written in reply to all the emails Council has received on this topics.
Whomever gets the appointment will have a significant advantage should they choose to later run for the election and may hold the position for a long time. Which is likely why the drafters of the State Constitution believed allowing adequate time to choose the best replacement was more important than simply making a fast decision.
The Constitution allows up to 60 days after a vacancy has occurred for the Council to make the appointment. The Republican party spent 14 of the 60 days to provide the Council three names.
Two of the three candidates are unknown to most of the Councilmembers, and the Council has requested 10 days to provide them a questionnaire and get their responses. The list of questions the applicants are being asked to answer was unanimously approved 6-0 by the full Council – Browne, Byrd, Buchannan, Kershner, Frazey and Donovan (Elenbaas recused himself).
This will help ensure all applicants are treated equally and to assist the council to determine which Republican candidate will best represent the 42nd district (which is the council’s responsibility under the Constitution to do). Assuming the applicants complete their questionnaires by Friday’s deadline the Council expects to make the appointment on its next regular meeting, January 11th
This means the appointment should happen 25 days after the vacancy occurred.
In comparison Senator Ranker resigned from the 40th on January 9th, 2019 (well after the holidays and just before the legislative session started), and his constituents had no representation in the Senate for 28 days until his replacement was appointed on Feb 5th.
Based on the current schedule it looks like the new 42nd senator will be seated in the legislature on January 11th (three days faster than the 40th appointment process) and only one day after the legislative session opens.
Be well.
Rud
Rud Browne
Councilmember – District One
Here is the response that e-mailer’s get who are not the County Executive… The State Constitution allows the Council to take up to 60 days after vacancy occurred to make the appointment.
The Republicans spent 14 of the 60 days to provide the Council three names.
The council has asked for 10 days to provide the applicants a questionnaire and get their responses. To help the council determine which Republican candidate will best represent the 42nd district (which is the councils job to do).
Assuming the applicants complete their questionnaires by Friday’s deadline the Council expects to make the appointment on January 11th
This means the appointment should happen 25 days after the vacancy occurred.
In comparison Senator Ranker resigned from the 40th on January 9th 2019 (well after the holidays), and his replacement was appointed Feb 5th (28 days later).
Based on the current schedule it looks like the 42nd vacancy will be filled three days earlier than the 40th was.
Be well.
This is an email I sent to Council today in reply to all the emails Council and I have received on this topic of Senator appointment.
I am replying to your (and many other emails) as a constituent of 42nd district, not as County Executive.
It is the prerogative of the Council to develop the process to make the appointment for the vacancy on the legislature, when such an occasion present itself. The “transparency” and “public input” are the necessary components and very foundation of our democracy. These shall NOT be viewed as partisan actions. Even when the Dec 22nd Council meeting was happening the answer from Whatcom GOP was not clear at all, when they will send their choices to the Council. However, the date of January 4th Council meeting was set. Along with CM Donovan, I also said that January 11, one day after the session starts, is not necessarily too late.
The Whatcom GOP sent their names on mid-day of Dec 31st and a holiday weekend. Allowing only 3 days to the Council Members to make an important decision is not fair, especially when there is very little public information available about the proposed candidates.
The person who is appointed, represents ALL constituents of 42nd district not GOP voters. So ‘transparency and ‘public input’ are not outrageous asks or partisan in any manner, which has been described as a political ploy by some Council Members. It is NOT the intent of the law (as Hope has tried to infer) that such appointment shall be a rubber stamp on the particular party’s nominated candidates. That is the reason, we have an elected Council, who represent all constituents of the county to weigh in from perspective of whole county and not just nominating political party. The Council Members MUST be allowed time and be held accountable for proper due diligence before making such an important decision.
Also, the argument to rush the appointment of Senator immediately on January 4th because January 11th, one day into the start of legislature session will jeopardize the lives of the North County flood victims, is very hollow and a political ploy. I believe this argument is a manipulation of the sufferings of the flood victims for a political pandering to their base. This vacated position had lot of opportunities to speak for the help to flood victims and supporting the FEMA disaster declaration.
I look forward to the Council deliberations for the appointment of the Senator for 42nd District next week.
Thanks!
Satpal Sidhu
Here is the letter that Councilman Browne put out on the 22nd of December. He also makes the point Tyler Byrd makes in the Video
42 leg process
Rud Browne
Council, Dana Brown-Davis, + 1
12/22/2021
While I respect the council staff (and council’s) need to have a break, I believe we
have an obligation to complete the 42nd Leg vacancy as fast as the 42nd Republicans
PCO’s want to drive it. This is very different situation than the
Ranker/Morris replacements when the 40th. District was not facing any particular times
sensitive issues. The 42nd is currently dealing with the worst disaster in its history and this is a short
session year. If they are willing to invest the. to move quickly over Christmas to ensure a senator from the 42nd has a seat at the table when it comes to discussions about allocating money to help flood victims I think we have an obligation to respond as quickly as we can even if it impacts our holidays.
Be well.
Rud
Rud Browne
Councilmember for District One
Whatcom County Council
311 Grand Ave. Suite 105
Bellingham, WA 98225
Flat out unacceptable.
My thoughts absolutely echo those of Denise Baker. There is no doubt these questions were generated by those opposing the views that Senator Erickson had.
In a letter to me, Rud Browne indicated that every council member voted “yes” to accept the questions. Is this true?
Other than the first couple of questions, the rest are meant to ferret out any opposing views to the council and only select a progressive candidate. That is not who the voters of this district had voted for when they voted for Senator Erickson. The council’s intent is to control the representation of this district and close off any opposing voices to their beliefs.
I am sickened by these questions that so clearly demonstrate their agenda.
[…] Here are the questions: […]
[…] The”Questions mentioned in the quoted e-mail , are here.. […]
We are new to Whatcom County and are definitely conservative, one reason for buying a home in Ferndale was the local Politics. We had property in San Juan County for 33 years and were residents for 15 then with problems with ferries, politics and aging, it was time to settle for a last home in our 80s.
replacing Erickson with a conservative is essential. Jan & Ed Ferro
That they would do this shocked me and when I read the questioned sickened me. They could have just as well asked “Are you a Progressive Democrat”. Anyhow I believe the only response from all is something along the lines of “we all agree the questions are inappropriate and will not answer them. What ever the response they must agree to act in unison before subjecting themselves to the wish list of the far left.
We voted a conservative into that position. The person replacing him should hold his views, not the views of the council!!!! And that person should be able to keep his or her day job as all members of our legislature have to do in order to pay their bills.
I hope the new senator doesn’t hold Ericksen’s views. Ericksen was a self dealer and did as little as possible for his district (my district). Here’s to setting the bar a bit higher.
Are you now or ever been a conservative?
Whatcom Democratic leadership wants to remove another conservative voice from the County Council.
Their hyper-partisan actions will not bring County residents closer together, which of course is the purpose of effective leadership.
The Hatfield’s and McCoy’s are at it again, fighting for power, while the energy needed to address citizens problems languish unattended.