This story is another in the series of stories that have arisen because of the Hirst Decision and about the reaction to that decision of local entities.
And this one by Tribal Leader Tim Bellew…Lummi Leader says NO to Hirst Fix.
No lack of Water in the City of Bellingham.
City of Bellingham gives Lummi Tribal Sewer and Water District … 35,000 gallons a week for their construction project in the city limits of Ferndale.
From an e-mail chain dated August 23rd 2017 From Bellingham Public Works Director Ted A Carlson.
“Met with the Mayor about this issue today. She agreed that we could provide the Lummi with construction water up to the amount we are flushing without charging them.
I also called Ferndale to let them know about the Lummi request and to see if they had any issue since the construction is actually within the Ferndale limits. Ferndale was fine with it, in fact it is their preference that Lummi get the construction water from us, they are having some supply issues right now.” The rest of this part of the e-mail chain is here.
Terms and conditions to this point:
- The Lummi Tribal Sewer and Water District will have use of 35,000 gallons a week at no charge. This “no charge” is a representation of a trade by the city which would save the city the “cost of flushing a system” that was little used.
- Any usage over 35,000 gallons per week will be billed at the regular rate.
There was an unexpected increase in the water usage and the resulting billing at the beginning of this agreement and this caused the following exchange with the Lummi Tribal Sewer and Water District.
From the Finance Department of the City of Bellingham:
“The first bill for the Lummi Tribal Water District agreement was for $24,724.83 – which was 5935 units of water consumption. The bill was paid but the check came back with a “stop payment” today. Their first bill credit of 80 units ($301.60) was based off of pro-rated amount provided by the meter reading group. Going forward they will get the credit for 374 units per cycle as I understand it.
The receipt will be voided today. Please let me know if any billing changes need to be made and how to proceed with the outstanding balance.”
Included in this e-mail was the following usage data chart:
As time went on there were other back and forth e-mails on billing stretching into 2018.
From: Asbjornsen, Andrew D.
- “Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 8:48 AM
- To: Carlson, Ted A. <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Johnston, Eric C. <email@example.com>
- Cc: Henshaw, Brian L. <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Slick, Jodie L. <email@example.com>
- Subject: RE: Lummi Construction water use
- The Lummi Tribal Water District was scheduled for shut off on Tuesday, January 2nd, with $77,432.38 outstanding on their account. We did not include them on the shut off list for that day. They will be billed again on Tuesday, January 9th, for approximately $33,000. This will bring their total outstanding balance to approximately $100,000.”
The Complete E-mail exchange on this subject starts from the “newest” email and ends with the “oldest” and is available here.
In conclusion by the time of a report obtained on February 27th shows a zero balance.lummi water district account history Final Accounting sheet
Summary Discussion Points.
Here are some thoughts for our readers to make comment:
The 35000 gallons per week would allow 500wells at 100 gallons a day to be built in Northern Whatcom County.
The increased usage is an indication also that the Water Management for the new project on Slater Road.